Review




Structured Review

Addgene inc aav9 syn
Aav9 Syn, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 120 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aav9 syn/product/Addgene inc
Average 96 stars, based on 120 article reviews
aav9 syn - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

96
Addgene inc aav9 syn
Aav9 Syn, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aav9 syn/product/Addgene inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aav9 syn - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Addgene inc paav syn flex gcamp6s wpre sv40 aav9
Paav Syn Flex Gcamp6s Wpre Sv40 Aav9, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/paav syn flex gcamp6s wpre sv40 aav9/product/Addgene inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
paav syn flex gcamp6s wpre sv40 aav9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Addgene inc aav9
Aav9, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aav9/product/Addgene inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aav9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Addgene inc addgene aav9 hsyn dio gcamp6m wpre sv40
Addgene Aav9 Hsyn Dio Gcamp6m Wpre Sv40, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/addgene aav9 hsyn dio gcamp6m wpre sv40/product/Addgene inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
addgene aav9 hsyn dio gcamp6m wpre sv40 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Addgene inc aav9 syn gcamp7s wpre
Aav9 Syn Gcamp7s Wpre, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aav9 syn gcamp7s wpre/product/Addgene inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aav9 syn gcamp7s wpre - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Addgene inc aav9 syn flex jgcamp7f
(A) Schematic of the free-moving behavioral setup utilizing two perpendicular high-speed cameras for simultaneous recording and 3D reconstruction of forelimb reaching kinematics. (B) Decomposition of the reaching sequence into six distinct, stereotyped action motifs ( Lift , Reach , Open , Grasp , Retract , Drink ). Top and bottom rows show orthogonal views of the posture for each motif. Colors correspond to specific motifs throughout the figure (color legend inset). Trial-based task structure illustrated above. (C) Representative motif ethogram (top) and corresponding motif probability (bottom) from an example session (150 trials), aligned to the first Open motif. (D) Motif transition matrix from the representative session in (C). Each color block represents the transition probability from the motif on the y-axis to the motif on the x-axis. (E) Reconstructed 3D trajectories of the forelimb for all trials in the representative session in (C), color-coded by motif. (F) Schematic of the fiber <t>photometry</t> <t>strategy.</t> <t>AAV9-Syn-FLEX-jGCaMP7f</t> was injected into the SNr to record populational calcium dynamics in SNr GABAergic neurons during behavior. (G) Representative heatmaps of Z-scored SNr calcium signals from ipsilateral (left) and contralateral (right) hemispheres, aligned to water delivery and sorted by the onset of the first Open motif (pink line). Error bars represent mean ± SEM. (H) Average Z-scored SNr activity aligned to water delivery, stratified as early reaching trials and late reaching trials by reaction time (top 30% vs. bottom 30%). n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. (I) Correlation matrix summarizing the relationship between motif-specific kinematics (Trajectory Travelled Length, Mean/Peak Velocity) and motif specific SNr Z-scores. Circle size denotes statistical significance (p-value). Color intensity indicates the correlation coefficient. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used (Supplementary Table 1). n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. Refer to Table 1 for summary statistics. (J) Representative scatter plots showing significant positive correlations between SNr activity and specific kinematic parameters: Open motif trajectory length (top) and Grasp motif mean velocity (bottom). Colored outlines in (I) indicate the specific correlations displayed here. n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. Pearson correlation coefficient was used.
Aav9 Syn Flex Jgcamp7f, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aav9 syn flex jgcamp7f/product/Addgene inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aav9 syn flex jgcamp7f - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc aav9 hsyn jgcamp7b
a. Schematic of longitudinal Ca 2+ imaging recording schedules from the SoD experience session to the CFC memory recall session. b. Expression of the Janelia variant Ca <t>2+</t> <t>indicator</t> <t>AAV9-hSyn-JGCaMP7b</t> and the location of the implanted GRIN lens in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus. Scale bar, 250 µm. c. Example image of cells extracted from Ca 2+ imaging and representative traces of z scored neural activity. d. Schematic of the analysis flowchart for detecting recall-specific ensembles using PCA/ICA dimensionality reduction methods. After all PCA/ICA ensembles from the CFC recall session were detected, these ensembles were further categorized into recall-specific (pink) or recall-nonspecific ensembles (blue) by comparing the ensemble activity in the CFC recall session with that in the previous CFC pre-shock session by Wilcoxon rank sum methods. For each example trace of the ensemble activity, the corresponding raster plot of the neural activity is shown with the same colour. e. Multisession comparison of the averaged activity index of the recall-specific ensembles, which is normalized by the average activity rate of the recall-nonspecific ensembles per mouse for each corresponding session. (Neutral n = 14; SoD n = 28 ensembles; two-way RM ANOVA with correction; interaction P <0.001; F (6, 240) = 5.382; Šídák’s multiple comparisons test). f. Pearson correlation analysis of the activity index of recall-specific ensemble during the SI-ICR session and prospective total freezing level (%) in the CFC recall session per SoD mouse. ( r = 0.9378, P = 0.0184, n = 5 mice) g. Activity rate of each CFC recall-specific ensemble in the neutral group in the home cage before the neutral experience (Pre-Neutral-home cage) and during the neutral session (novel home cage exploration) on day 6 ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.3306); additionally, the activity rate of the SoD group in the home cage before the SoD session (Pre-SoD-home cage) and during the SoD session on day 6 of the SoD experience ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0014). h. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the novel B6 mouse encounter (SI-B6) and novel ICR mouse encounter (SI-ICR) in the social interaction test for the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.4352) and SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0066). i. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the 2-minute exploration period before receiving the first electric shock (CFC pre-shock) and during the remaining session after the delivery of the first shock (CFC post-shock) on the CFC conditioning day in the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.0076) and the SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0053). j. Schematic for assessing the correlation of the CFC recall-specific ensemble activity during opposite corner stays during the SI-ICR session and the ensemble activity during the freeze state in the CFC recall session. Example traces of averaged recall-specific ensemble activity (z scored) around the onset of the opposite corner entries in the SI-ICR (lower left) and during freezing behaviours in CFC recall (lower right) sessions. k. Spearman correlation ( r value shown) for the activity of the CFC recall-specific ensembles in the neutral group during opposite corner stays and activity during freezing in the CFC recall session for the neutral group ( r = - 0.3600, P = 0.2047) and l. SoD group ( r = 0.4426, P = 0.0208, n = 27 ensembles). m. Representative heatmaps showing the intercell type pairwise correlation analysis between SI avoidance-related (SI opposite corner-related neurons) and CFC aversion-related (shock- and freeze-related neurons) cells in the non-freezing state (left) and the freezing state in the CFC recall session (right). Red indicates a significant correlation between two neurons. n. Percentage of significant pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related and CFC aversion-related cells during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral n = 5; SoD n = 5 mice; unpaired t test, t = 2.653; P = 0.0291). o. Percentage of significant intracell type neuron‒neuron pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related neurons during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral, n = 5; SoD, n = 5 mice; Unpaired t test, t = 0.2808; P = 0.786). Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance is expressed as * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001.
Aav9 Hsyn Jgcamp7b, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aav9 hsyn jgcamp7b/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aav9 hsyn jgcamp7b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc aav9 syn nes jrcamp1b wpre sv40
a. Schematic of longitudinal Ca 2+ imaging recording schedules from the SoD experience session to the CFC memory recall session. b. Expression of the Janelia variant Ca <t>2+</t> <t>indicator</t> <t>AAV9-hSyn-JGCaMP7b</t> and the location of the implanted GRIN lens in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus. Scale bar, 250 µm. c. Example image of cells extracted from Ca 2+ imaging and representative traces of z scored neural activity. d. Schematic of the analysis flowchart for detecting recall-specific ensembles using PCA/ICA dimensionality reduction methods. After all PCA/ICA ensembles from the CFC recall session were detected, these ensembles were further categorized into recall-specific (pink) or recall-nonspecific ensembles (blue) by comparing the ensemble activity in the CFC recall session with that in the previous CFC pre-shock session by Wilcoxon rank sum methods. For each example trace of the ensemble activity, the corresponding raster plot of the neural activity is shown with the same colour. e. Multisession comparison of the averaged activity index of the recall-specific ensembles, which is normalized by the average activity rate of the recall-nonspecific ensembles per mouse for each corresponding session. (Neutral n = 14; SoD n = 28 ensembles; two-way RM ANOVA with correction; interaction P <0.001; F (6, 240) = 5.382; Šídák’s multiple comparisons test). f. Pearson correlation analysis of the activity index of recall-specific ensemble during the SI-ICR session and prospective total freezing level (%) in the CFC recall session per SoD mouse. ( r = 0.9378, P = 0.0184, n = 5 mice) g. Activity rate of each CFC recall-specific ensemble in the neutral group in the home cage before the neutral experience (Pre-Neutral-home cage) and during the neutral session (novel home cage exploration) on day 6 ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.3306); additionally, the activity rate of the SoD group in the home cage before the SoD session (Pre-SoD-home cage) and during the SoD session on day 6 of the SoD experience ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0014). h. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the novel B6 mouse encounter (SI-B6) and novel ICR mouse encounter (SI-ICR) in the social interaction test for the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.4352) and SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0066). i. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the 2-minute exploration period before receiving the first electric shock (CFC pre-shock) and during the remaining session after the delivery of the first shock (CFC post-shock) on the CFC conditioning day in the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.0076) and the SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0053). j. Schematic for assessing the correlation of the CFC recall-specific ensemble activity during opposite corner stays during the SI-ICR session and the ensemble activity during the freeze state in the CFC recall session. Example traces of averaged recall-specific ensemble activity (z scored) around the onset of the opposite corner entries in the SI-ICR (lower left) and during freezing behaviours in CFC recall (lower right) sessions. k. Spearman correlation ( r value shown) for the activity of the CFC recall-specific ensembles in the neutral group during opposite corner stays and activity during freezing in the CFC recall session for the neutral group ( r = - 0.3600, P = 0.2047) and l. SoD group ( r = 0.4426, P = 0.0208, n = 27 ensembles). m. Representative heatmaps showing the intercell type pairwise correlation analysis between SI avoidance-related (SI opposite corner-related neurons) and CFC aversion-related (shock- and freeze-related neurons) cells in the non-freezing state (left) and the freezing state in the CFC recall session (right). Red indicates a significant correlation between two neurons. n. Percentage of significant pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related and CFC aversion-related cells during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral n = 5; SoD n = 5 mice; unpaired t test, t = 2.653; P = 0.0291). o. Percentage of significant intracell type neuron‒neuron pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related neurons during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral, n = 5; SoD, n = 5 mice; Unpaired t test, t = 0.2808; P = 0.786). Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance is expressed as * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001.
Aav9 Syn Nes Jrcamp1b Wpre Sv40, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aav9 syn nes jrcamp1b wpre sv40/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aav9 syn nes jrcamp1b wpre sv40 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Schematic of the free-moving behavioral setup utilizing two perpendicular high-speed cameras for simultaneous recording and 3D reconstruction of forelimb reaching kinematics. (B) Decomposition of the reaching sequence into six distinct, stereotyped action motifs ( Lift , Reach , Open , Grasp , Retract , Drink ). Top and bottom rows show orthogonal views of the posture for each motif. Colors correspond to specific motifs throughout the figure (color legend inset). Trial-based task structure illustrated above. (C) Representative motif ethogram (top) and corresponding motif probability (bottom) from an example session (150 trials), aligned to the first Open motif. (D) Motif transition matrix from the representative session in (C). Each color block represents the transition probability from the motif on the y-axis to the motif on the x-axis. (E) Reconstructed 3D trajectories of the forelimb for all trials in the representative session in (C), color-coded by motif. (F) Schematic of the fiber photometry strategy. AAV9-Syn-FLEX-jGCaMP7f was injected into the SNr to record populational calcium dynamics in SNr GABAergic neurons during behavior. (G) Representative heatmaps of Z-scored SNr calcium signals from ipsilateral (left) and contralateral (right) hemispheres, aligned to water delivery and sorted by the onset of the first Open motif (pink line). Error bars represent mean ± SEM. (H) Average Z-scored SNr activity aligned to water delivery, stratified as early reaching trials and late reaching trials by reaction time (top 30% vs. bottom 30%). n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. (I) Correlation matrix summarizing the relationship between motif-specific kinematics (Trajectory Travelled Length, Mean/Peak Velocity) and motif specific SNr Z-scores. Circle size denotes statistical significance (p-value). Color intensity indicates the correlation coefficient. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used (Supplementary Table 1). n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. Refer to Table 1 for summary statistics. (J) Representative scatter plots showing significant positive correlations between SNr activity and specific kinematic parameters: Open motif trajectory length (top) and Grasp motif mean velocity (bottom). Colored outlines in (I) indicate the specific correlations displayed here. n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. Pearson correlation coefficient was used.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Basal ganglia output dynamically controls skilled forelimb kinematics in real time

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.09.710687

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of the free-moving behavioral setup utilizing two perpendicular high-speed cameras for simultaneous recording and 3D reconstruction of forelimb reaching kinematics. (B) Decomposition of the reaching sequence into six distinct, stereotyped action motifs ( Lift , Reach , Open , Grasp , Retract , Drink ). Top and bottom rows show orthogonal views of the posture for each motif. Colors correspond to specific motifs throughout the figure (color legend inset). Trial-based task structure illustrated above. (C) Representative motif ethogram (top) and corresponding motif probability (bottom) from an example session (150 trials), aligned to the first Open motif. (D) Motif transition matrix from the representative session in (C). Each color block represents the transition probability from the motif on the y-axis to the motif on the x-axis. (E) Reconstructed 3D trajectories of the forelimb for all trials in the representative session in (C), color-coded by motif. (F) Schematic of the fiber photometry strategy. AAV9-Syn-FLEX-jGCaMP7f was injected into the SNr to record populational calcium dynamics in SNr GABAergic neurons during behavior. (G) Representative heatmaps of Z-scored SNr calcium signals from ipsilateral (left) and contralateral (right) hemispheres, aligned to water delivery and sorted by the onset of the first Open motif (pink line). Error bars represent mean ± SEM. (H) Average Z-scored SNr activity aligned to water delivery, stratified as early reaching trials and late reaching trials by reaction time (top 30% vs. bottom 30%). n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. (I) Correlation matrix summarizing the relationship between motif-specific kinematics (Trajectory Travelled Length, Mean/Peak Velocity) and motif specific SNr Z-scores. Circle size denotes statistical significance (p-value). Color intensity indicates the correlation coefficient. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used (Supplementary Table 1). n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. Refer to Table 1 for summary statistics. (J) Representative scatter plots showing significant positive correlations between SNr activity and specific kinematic parameters: Open motif trajectory length (top) and Grasp motif mean velocity (bottom). Colored outlines in (I) indicate the specific correlations displayed here. n = 21 sessions (2100 trials), 7 mice. Pearson correlation coefficient was used.

Article Snippet: For miniscope calcium imaging, 100 nL of AAV9-Syn-FLEX-jGCaMP7f (Addgene #104488) was injected unilaterally into the left SNr.

Techniques: Sequencing, Blocking Assay, Injection, Activity Assay

(A) Schematic of the miniscope recording strategy. AAV9-Syn-FLEX-jGCaMP7f was injected into the SNr to monitor calcium dynamics in GABAergic projection neurons at single-cell resolution during behavior. (B) Average population activity aligned to the onset of the Reach motif. The solid line represents the mean, and the shaded area represents SEM. (C) Heatmap of trial-averaged, Reach-aligned calcium activity for all recorded neurons. (D) Proportion of neurons exhibiting significantly increased (orange), decreased (purple), or unchanged (gray) activity during specific action motifs compared to baseline periods (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test). (E) Heatmap of the change in activity (ΔZscore; Behavior - Baseline) for all neurons across the six action motifs, sorted in descending order by modulation magnitude during the Retract motif. (F) Representative temporal traces comparing actual (orange) and predicted (light purple) forelimb spatial coordinates (X, Y, Z) and velocity. Predictions were generated using a linear regression model trained on concurrent SNr population activity. (G) Quantification of the linear regression model’s performance ($R^2$ score) in predicting moment-by-moment kinematics across sessions. Violin plots display the full data distribution density, with internal box plots representing the median (center marker) and the interquartile range. (H) Heatmap of normalized regression weights for each neuron across the four predicted kinematic features. Neurons (rows) are sorted in descending order by their assigned weight in the velocity model. n = 315 neurons from 600 trials, 10 sessions, 5 mice.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Basal ganglia output dynamically controls skilled forelimb kinematics in real time

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.09.710687

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of the miniscope recording strategy. AAV9-Syn-FLEX-jGCaMP7f was injected into the SNr to monitor calcium dynamics in GABAergic projection neurons at single-cell resolution during behavior. (B) Average population activity aligned to the onset of the Reach motif. The solid line represents the mean, and the shaded area represents SEM. (C) Heatmap of trial-averaged, Reach-aligned calcium activity for all recorded neurons. (D) Proportion of neurons exhibiting significantly increased (orange), decreased (purple), or unchanged (gray) activity during specific action motifs compared to baseline periods (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test). (E) Heatmap of the change in activity (ΔZscore; Behavior - Baseline) for all neurons across the six action motifs, sorted in descending order by modulation magnitude during the Retract motif. (F) Representative temporal traces comparing actual (orange) and predicted (light purple) forelimb spatial coordinates (X, Y, Z) and velocity. Predictions were generated using a linear regression model trained on concurrent SNr population activity. (G) Quantification of the linear regression model’s performance ($R^2$ score) in predicting moment-by-moment kinematics across sessions. Violin plots display the full data distribution density, with internal box plots representing the median (center marker) and the interquartile range. (H) Heatmap of normalized regression weights for each neuron across the four predicted kinematic features. Neurons (rows) are sorted in descending order by their assigned weight in the velocity model. n = 315 neurons from 600 trials, 10 sessions, 5 mice.

Article Snippet: For miniscope calcium imaging, 100 nL of AAV9-Syn-FLEX-jGCaMP7f (Addgene #104488) was injected unilaterally into the left SNr.

Techniques: Injection, Single Cell, Activity Assay, Generated, Marker

a. Schematic of longitudinal Ca 2+ imaging recording schedules from the SoD experience session to the CFC memory recall session. b. Expression of the Janelia variant Ca 2+ indicator AAV9-hSyn-JGCaMP7b and the location of the implanted GRIN lens in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus. Scale bar, 250 µm. c. Example image of cells extracted from Ca 2+ imaging and representative traces of z scored neural activity. d. Schematic of the analysis flowchart for detecting recall-specific ensembles using PCA/ICA dimensionality reduction methods. After all PCA/ICA ensembles from the CFC recall session were detected, these ensembles were further categorized into recall-specific (pink) or recall-nonspecific ensembles (blue) by comparing the ensemble activity in the CFC recall session with that in the previous CFC pre-shock session by Wilcoxon rank sum methods. For each example trace of the ensemble activity, the corresponding raster plot of the neural activity is shown with the same colour. e. Multisession comparison of the averaged activity index of the recall-specific ensembles, which is normalized by the average activity rate of the recall-nonspecific ensembles per mouse for each corresponding session. (Neutral n = 14; SoD n = 28 ensembles; two-way RM ANOVA with correction; interaction P <0.001; F (6, 240) = 5.382; Šídák’s multiple comparisons test). f. Pearson correlation analysis of the activity index of recall-specific ensemble during the SI-ICR session and prospective total freezing level (%) in the CFC recall session per SoD mouse. ( r = 0.9378, P = 0.0184, n = 5 mice) g. Activity rate of each CFC recall-specific ensemble in the neutral group in the home cage before the neutral experience (Pre-Neutral-home cage) and during the neutral session (novel home cage exploration) on day 6 ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.3306); additionally, the activity rate of the SoD group in the home cage before the SoD session (Pre-SoD-home cage) and during the SoD session on day 6 of the SoD experience ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0014). h. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the novel B6 mouse encounter (SI-B6) and novel ICR mouse encounter (SI-ICR) in the social interaction test for the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.4352) and SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0066). i. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the 2-minute exploration period before receiving the first electric shock (CFC pre-shock) and during the remaining session after the delivery of the first shock (CFC post-shock) on the CFC conditioning day in the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.0076) and the SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0053). j. Schematic for assessing the correlation of the CFC recall-specific ensemble activity during opposite corner stays during the SI-ICR session and the ensemble activity during the freeze state in the CFC recall session. Example traces of averaged recall-specific ensemble activity (z scored) around the onset of the opposite corner entries in the SI-ICR (lower left) and during freezing behaviours in CFC recall (lower right) sessions. k. Spearman correlation ( r value shown) for the activity of the CFC recall-specific ensembles in the neutral group during opposite corner stays and activity during freezing in the CFC recall session for the neutral group ( r = - 0.3600, P = 0.2047) and l. SoD group ( r = 0.4426, P = 0.0208, n = 27 ensembles). m. Representative heatmaps showing the intercell type pairwise correlation analysis between SI avoidance-related (SI opposite corner-related neurons) and CFC aversion-related (shock- and freeze-related neurons) cells in the non-freezing state (left) and the freezing state in the CFC recall session (right). Red indicates a significant correlation between two neurons. n. Percentage of significant pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related and CFC aversion-related cells during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral n = 5; SoD n = 5 mice; unpaired t test, t = 2.653; P = 0.0291). o. Percentage of significant intracell type neuron‒neuron pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related neurons during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral, n = 5; SoD, n = 5 mice; Unpaired t test, t = 0.2808; P = 0.786). Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance is expressed as * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Sleep neural code perpetuates the evolving negativity bias under stress

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.03.709197

Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Schematic of longitudinal Ca 2+ imaging recording schedules from the SoD experience session to the CFC memory recall session. b. Expression of the Janelia variant Ca 2+ indicator AAV9-hSyn-JGCaMP7b and the location of the implanted GRIN lens in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus. Scale bar, 250 µm. c. Example image of cells extracted from Ca 2+ imaging and representative traces of z scored neural activity. d. Schematic of the analysis flowchart for detecting recall-specific ensembles using PCA/ICA dimensionality reduction methods. After all PCA/ICA ensembles from the CFC recall session were detected, these ensembles were further categorized into recall-specific (pink) or recall-nonspecific ensembles (blue) by comparing the ensemble activity in the CFC recall session with that in the previous CFC pre-shock session by Wilcoxon rank sum methods. For each example trace of the ensemble activity, the corresponding raster plot of the neural activity is shown with the same colour. e. Multisession comparison of the averaged activity index of the recall-specific ensembles, which is normalized by the average activity rate of the recall-nonspecific ensembles per mouse for each corresponding session. (Neutral n = 14; SoD n = 28 ensembles; two-way RM ANOVA with correction; interaction P <0.001; F (6, 240) = 5.382; Šídák’s multiple comparisons test). f. Pearson correlation analysis of the activity index of recall-specific ensemble during the SI-ICR session and prospective total freezing level (%) in the CFC recall session per SoD mouse. ( r = 0.9378, P = 0.0184, n = 5 mice) g. Activity rate of each CFC recall-specific ensemble in the neutral group in the home cage before the neutral experience (Pre-Neutral-home cage) and during the neutral session (novel home cage exploration) on day 6 ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.3306); additionally, the activity rate of the SoD group in the home cage before the SoD session (Pre-SoD-home cage) and during the SoD session on day 6 of the SoD experience ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0014). h. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the novel B6 mouse encounter (SI-B6) and novel ICR mouse encounter (SI-ICR) in the social interaction test for the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.4352) and SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0066). i. Activity rate of each recall-specific ensemble during the 2-minute exploration period before receiving the first electric shock (CFC pre-shock) and during the remaining session after the delivery of the first shock (CFC post-shock) on the CFC conditioning day in the neutral group ( n = 14 ensembles; Wilcoxon signed rank test; P = 0.0076) and the SoD group ( n = 28 ensembles, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.0053). j. Schematic for assessing the correlation of the CFC recall-specific ensemble activity during opposite corner stays during the SI-ICR session and the ensemble activity during the freeze state in the CFC recall session. Example traces of averaged recall-specific ensemble activity (z scored) around the onset of the opposite corner entries in the SI-ICR (lower left) and during freezing behaviours in CFC recall (lower right) sessions. k. Spearman correlation ( r value shown) for the activity of the CFC recall-specific ensembles in the neutral group during opposite corner stays and activity during freezing in the CFC recall session for the neutral group ( r = - 0.3600, P = 0.2047) and l. SoD group ( r = 0.4426, P = 0.0208, n = 27 ensembles). m. Representative heatmaps showing the intercell type pairwise correlation analysis between SI avoidance-related (SI opposite corner-related neurons) and CFC aversion-related (shock- and freeze-related neurons) cells in the non-freezing state (left) and the freezing state in the CFC recall session (right). Red indicates a significant correlation between two neurons. n. Percentage of significant pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related and CFC aversion-related cells during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral n = 5; SoD n = 5 mice; unpaired t test, t = 2.653; P = 0.0291). o. Percentage of significant intracell type neuron‒neuron pairwise correlations of SI avoidance-related neurons during the freezing state in the CFC recall session (Neutral, n = 5; SoD, n = 5 mice; Unpaired t test, t = 0.2808; P = 0.786). Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Statistical significance is expressed as * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: For longitudinal in vivo Ca2+ imaging experiments, we used a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector, AAV9-hSyn-jGCaMP7b (Janelia variant, Addgene: #104489, viral titer: 9.77 × 1013 vg/mL).

Techniques: Imaging, Expressing, Variant Assay, Activity Assay, Comparison